the green fairy in the dark pages of this diary I write a page
me as clear as the green fairy 
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Rope Harness Instructions
Dear nutritionists State veg admit that they are right! Newspapers
Why do so many
resistance among nutritionists state, in every country, vegetarian food?
"We vegetarians know for some time that our food supply, to dedicate a minimum of attention, it is beneficial to health. But the health authorities, subject to the pressure of the producers are reluctant to recognize the dangers arising from the consumption of products meat. And above all do not recognize that a vegetarian diet meets the criteria of a healthy diet. The dietary guidelines issued by the State Office of Public Health, say nothing about this subject. For us, this poses many problems. For example, in against those responsible for school meals or other public canteens, it is difficult to argue in favor of vegetarian dishes, a vegetarian diet because it is not officially approved. This must change! "
So began the letter in due course by the Swiss vegetarian Thomas Zeltner, director of the Federal Office of Public Health. And in Italy, you do? It is natural to ask ourselves, for comparison. It is just had a few days ago, organized by the Corriere della Sera a meeting between representatives of the Society of Nutrition and Vegetarian INRAN, the Institute of State who would chair the nutritional studies and their dissemination in the Italian population. An interesting, dalla quale ci attendevamo almeno una risoluzione comune. Ma finora non si è saputo nulla.
Ma torniamo alla originale petizione dei vegetariani svizzeri: "Dopo i tanti scandali dell’industria di prodotti animali, dalla diossina nel pesce alla mucca pazza e ai maiali con gli antibiotici, "è il momento di promuovere il vegetarismo nelle Linee Guida ufficiali". Questo lo scopo dichiarato.
"La tutela della salute è uno dei motivi del nostro impegno per il vegetarismo. Come si sa, le inquietanti rivelazioni sui prodotti alimentari di origine animale sono sempre più frequenti, e non solo sulla carne ma anche sul pesce. Alla luce di tali fatti riconosciuti ufficialmente e scientificamente ci permettiamo di indirizzare alcuni commenti e suggestions on "Recommendations for a healthy diet" that constitute a reference, particularly for public facilities such as school kitchens and canteens, so that they can be changed as soon as possible at some points in the interest of public health "
.
1. "fish. The main disagreement is on fish consumption. We encourage people to eat as often as possible ("... fish, on the contrary [ as opposed to meat, Ed ] should have a primary place in healthy, since the fat content of quality").
"Well, we have vegetarians always denounced the negative effects for the health of fish consumption. For some time the scientific community failed to disclose to the general public that the consumption of fish, such as meat, may be harmful to your health, because fat tissue of animals and concentrate the toxins. Finally, a Report of the Scientific Committee for Food of the European Union has put an end to this lacuna. ( Liberté / Le Courrier de Genève ) "Dioxin and behold the" crazy fish "refers to the alarming conclusions of this report:" ... It was already known contaminated meat and animal products, to varying degrees depending on the location, the dioxin and its "relative" chemical, polychlorinated-biphenyl (PCB). The fish were already known documents alarming hormonal imbalances of carp lakes of North America and the salmon of the Baltic Sea, as well as their cousins \u200b\u200bintensively bred in Scotland. But we could not imagine this level of pollution 10 times more of the "reference", ie milk and eggs, and 30 times more than the permitted limits for the PCB! Figures, mind you, are concerned with the wild fish, is that of farming in fresh water ... ".
.
In short - it is our opinion - by the call of vegetarians reveals a Swiss unspoken truth of all that that is, the "healthy" fish is much more polluted ground beef, milk, cheese and eggs! Other than "alternative" health-conscious meat, as many nutritionists say, attracted, in fact misled by the few milligrams of omega-3, however, found almost exclusively in raw liver, is also highly polluted easily by the sophisticated (sometimes diluted with ordinary oil ), are highly perishable because ultra-polyunsaturated fatty acids. Omega-3 may be replaced by plants such as nuts and herbs, which provide useful precursors.
.
"The European Union countries - continues the document - are not the only ones sounding the alarm about the risks of fish consumption. The U.S. Federal Agency for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has printed a directive that is not recommended for pregnant women to eat the big fish like tuna, swordfish and dogfish because of mercury content, which can lead to congenital abnormalities in the newborn central nervous system (brain, etc.). Ben 60 000 babies every year are affected, the United States alone!
"In light of these scientific facts constatai by official bodies, it is clear - the appeal argues vegetarian - the official dietary recommendations for the population are correct because they contained" inaccuracies dangerous "with urgency".
.
2. "Meat. The nutrient recommendations officers, it is true, warn its overuse. Which is an improvement over some twenty years ago, when the meat was considered a staple food. But we believe this is still not enough. There seems to be particularly serious given the facts revealed to the public with the meat and the risks to human health (risk of BSE transmission to humans of dioxin contamination, antibiotics and other toxins, etc.), it would be better not state that "... the meat is (...) a food of great value ...." On the contrary, it would be appropriate to point out that vegetable proteins are of excellent quality. And with plant protein [beans, in particular, Ed], the population should not fear insufficient protein, since it is sufficient to apply the simple principles of nutrition and sufficient to vary their diet, something desired by the recommendations, to cover the nutritional requirements.
.
3. "Vegetarian food. The state nutritional guidelines do not contain any positive mention of vegetarian nutrition. On the contrary, insists that" ... food of plant origin must be completed in a reasonable amount of food of animal origin ... "as if to underline that the 'alimentation vegetarian does not meet the criteria of a healthy diet, which is not true. Today, in fact, just about the many scandals in the meat industry and the pollution of fish, a vegetarian diet should be encouraged.
"directives from other countries like the United States, among other things traditionally aligned with the consumption of meat, they recognize the vegetarian diet as a healthy way of eating. The American dietary guidelines, from 2000 mention many plant sources of protein, between pulses and oil seeds (eg beans, chickpeas, lentils, peas, cream, peanuts, tofu, soy protein patties. And for the Americans kick plant sources indicate several very interesting. "
" Finally - Writing leaders of Vegetarian Swiss, Christina Maier and Renato Pichler - we very much hope that the State agency for nutrition changes in the interest of the public health dietary recommendations, in the sense that we have already said, acknowledging that a vegetarian diet balanced to meet the criteria healthy eating. " 
Why do so many
resistance among nutritionists state, in every country, vegetarian food? "We vegetarians know for some time that our food supply, to dedicate a minimum of attention, it is beneficial to health. But the health authorities, subject to the pressure of the producers are reluctant to recognize the dangers arising from the consumption of products meat. And above all do not recognize that a vegetarian diet meets the criteria of a healthy diet. The dietary guidelines issued by the State Office of Public Health, say nothing about this subject. For us, this poses many problems. For example, in against those responsible for school meals or other public canteens, it is difficult to argue in favor of vegetarian dishes, a vegetarian diet because it is not officially approved. This must change! "
So began the letter in due course by the Swiss vegetarian Thomas Zeltner, director of the Federal Office of Public Health. And in Italy, you do? It is natural to ask ourselves, for comparison. It is just had a few days ago, organized by the Corriere della Sera a meeting between representatives of the Society of Nutrition and Vegetarian INRAN, the Institute of State who would chair the nutritional studies and their dissemination in the Italian population. An interesting, dalla quale ci attendevamo almeno una risoluzione comune. Ma finora non si è saputo nulla.
Ma torniamo alla originale petizione dei vegetariani svizzeri: "Dopo i tanti scandali dell’industria di prodotti animali, dalla diossina nel pesce alla mucca pazza e ai maiali con gli antibiotici, "è il momento di promuovere il vegetarismo nelle Linee Guida ufficiali". Questo lo scopo dichiarato.
"La tutela della salute è uno dei motivi del nostro impegno per il vegetarismo. Come si sa, le inquietanti rivelazioni sui prodotti alimentari di origine animale sono sempre più frequenti, e non solo sulla carne ma anche sul pesce. Alla luce di tali fatti riconosciuti ufficialmente e scientificamente ci permettiamo di indirizzare alcuni commenti e suggestions on "Recommendations for a healthy diet" that constitute a reference, particularly for public facilities such as school kitchens and canteens, so that they can be changed as soon as possible at some points in the interest of public health "
.
1. "fish. The main disagreement is on fish consumption. We encourage people to eat as often as possible ("... fish, on the contrary [ as opposed to meat, Ed ] should have a primary place in healthy, since the fat content of quality").
"Well, we have vegetarians always denounced the negative effects for the health of fish consumption. For some time the scientific community failed to disclose to the general public that the consumption of fish, such as meat, may be harmful to your health, because fat tissue of animals and concentrate the toxins. Finally, a Report of the Scientific Committee for Food of the European Union has put an end to this lacuna. ( Liberté / Le Courrier de Genève ) "Dioxin and behold the" crazy fish "refers to the alarming conclusions of this report:" ... It was already known contaminated meat and animal products, to varying degrees depending on the location, the dioxin and its "relative" chemical, polychlorinated-biphenyl (PCB). The fish were already known documents alarming hormonal imbalances of carp lakes of North America and the salmon of the Baltic Sea, as well as their cousins \u200b\u200bintensively bred in Scotland. But we could not imagine this level of pollution 10 times more of the "reference", ie milk and eggs, and 30 times more than the permitted limits for the PCB! Figures, mind you, are concerned with the wild fish, is that of farming in fresh water ... ".
.
In short - it is our opinion - by the call of vegetarians reveals a Swiss unspoken truth of all that that is, the "healthy" fish is much more polluted ground beef, milk, cheese and eggs! Other than "alternative" health-conscious meat, as many nutritionists say, attracted, in fact misled by the few milligrams of omega-3, however, found almost exclusively in raw liver, is also highly polluted easily by the sophisticated (sometimes diluted with ordinary oil ), are highly perishable because ultra-polyunsaturated fatty acids. Omega-3 may be replaced by plants such as nuts and herbs, which provide useful precursors.
.
"The European Union countries - continues the document - are not the only ones sounding the alarm about the risks of fish consumption. The U.S. Federal Agency for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has printed a directive that is not recommended for pregnant women to eat the big fish like tuna, swordfish and dogfish because of mercury content, which can lead to congenital abnormalities in the newborn central nervous system (brain, etc.). Ben 60 000 babies every year are affected, the United States alone!
"In light of these scientific facts constatai by official bodies, it is clear - the appeal argues vegetarian - the official dietary recommendations for the population are correct because they contained" inaccuracies dangerous "with urgency".
.
2. "Meat. The nutrient recommendations officers, it is true, warn its overuse. Which is an improvement over some twenty years ago, when the meat was considered a staple food. But we believe this is still not enough. There seems to be particularly serious given the facts revealed to the public with the meat and the risks to human health (risk of BSE transmission to humans of dioxin contamination, antibiotics and other toxins, etc.), it would be better not state that "... the meat is (...) a food of great value ...." On the contrary, it would be appropriate to point out that vegetable proteins are of excellent quality. And with plant protein [beans, in particular, Ed], the population should not fear insufficient protein, since it is sufficient to apply the simple principles of nutrition and sufficient to vary their diet, something desired by the recommendations, to cover the nutritional requirements.
.
3. "Vegetarian food. The state nutritional guidelines do not contain any positive mention of vegetarian nutrition. On the contrary, insists that" ... food of plant origin must be completed in a reasonable amount of food of animal origin ... "as if to underline that the 'alimentation vegetarian does not meet the criteria of a healthy diet, which is not true. Today, in fact, just about the many scandals in the meat industry and the pollution of fish, a vegetarian diet should be encouraged.
"directives from other countries like the United States, among other things traditionally aligned with the consumption of meat, they recognize the vegetarian diet as a healthy way of eating. The American dietary guidelines, from 2000 mention many plant sources of protein, between pulses and oil seeds (eg beans, chickpeas, lentils, peas, cream, peanuts, tofu, soy protein patties. And for the Americans kick plant sources indicate several very interesting. "
" Finally - Writing leaders of Vegetarian Swiss, Christina Maier and Renato Pichler - we very much hope that the State agency for nutrition changes in the interest of the public health dietary recommendations, in the sense that we have already said, acknowledging that a vegetarian diet balanced to meet the criteria healthy eating. "
Friday, March 5, 2010
How To Repair Outdoor Slate Flaking
morning hunt lost wallet ... and then miraculously found ... desire for peace, instead of rest and plenty to do. more than another big effort to be optimistic in the face of traffic at the races, the lies and fatigue.
the good intentions that are many times where you have gone? I also lost ones during the day and I hope that this search is providential.
the green fairy 
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)